The Spaniards did
defeat the Indians with signs. However, this is not as simple as it may seem.
They defeated the Indians because of their superior inter-human communication
capabilities. The Spaniards culturally focus more on the art of warfare along
with how to manipulate communication to further their objectives. On the other
hand, the Aztecs’ cultural values focused on communication between the natural
world as well as their deities. This gap in communication practices is one of
the reasons for the downfall of the Indians.
The Spaniards were
easily able to uncover what drove the Indians and then they used it against
them. Gods and the natural world were held in high regard and the Spanish used
this knowledge to their advantage by utilizing the skills they had learned
about manipulation. On page 123 Todorov states, “Language has always been the
companion of empire”. This quote proves true in the case of the Spaniards and the
Indians. If the communication practices between the two peoples were similar
there most likely would have been a different outcome, but since the gap
existed it was quite easy for the Spaniards to take advantage of it. The empire
built by the Spanish depended in part on their ability to understand and
respond to possible weaknesses gleaned among the natives. The signs portrayed
were manipulated by the Spanish for their own benefit.
Besides signs
and language, the Spanish also had the advantage of advanced weapon technology
and resistance to different diseases which they were exposed to in Europe.
These advantages also played a significant role in their conquering and without
them, I do not believe manipulation of signs would have been enough to take
over the land. Simply put the Spaniards did defeat the Indians by signs,
because of their ability to manipulate communication, the knowledge of which
was derived from their cultural standards. Yet it is important to note that
there were other factors besides communication which backed these signs such as
the lack of illness, in comparison to the copious amounts who fell ill within
the Aztecs, along with the Spaniards superior knowledge of weaponry. The bland
statement of: The Spaniards did defeat the Indians with signs, seems unsupported,
one must define the context behind the signs as well as acknowledge other
factors which went into the conquering of the Americas.
I believe that today the Indians’ version of communication that concern the natural world is imperative if we want to stop climate change or save endangered species and that the Spaniards’ version of communication would get a country exiled from international systems and organizations. Do you agree? If yes, how is today’s society different from the 1500s one? If no, how is today’s society the same?
ReplyDeleteI am not quite sure what you mean by the comparisons you laid out. However, I do believe that the modes of communication depend on perspective. Cortes does comment on nature and the natural world around him, but he also is able to effectively communicate/manipulate other people. The Indians are focused on communication in a spiritual sense with the natural world and their gods.
ReplyDeleteToday's society is very different from the 1500s because of the enormous advancements we have made in technology, medicine and the large knowledge base we have accumulated about other people. No longer are monarchies conquering people to own land, it is all about monetary transaction and resources.